<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading Ahead &#8211; August</title>
	<atom:link href="http://childrens-literacy.com/2009/08/15/reading-ahead-august/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://childrens-literacy.com/2009/08/15/reading-ahead-august/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Bringing reading home for families.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:23:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReadingTub</title>
		<link>http://childrens-literacy.com/2009/08/15/reading-ahead-august/comment-page-1/#comment-701</link>
		<dc:creator>ReadingTub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://childrens-literacy.com/?p=1487#comment-701</guid>
		<description>Hi Susan - We read every book we receive and they are all cataloged so that when I find someone who has an interest in the topic, I can place the book with that audience. We think it is better for the reader and (potentially) the creator. 

You&#039;re right, it is a bit time consuming. Since last fall we&#039;ve closed the mailbox to new authors/publishers. We continue to get books from existing donors and we&#039;ve gotten about 400 so far this year. That is still a LOT of material to read. 

Our model is not first-in-first-out, but I am very conscious of wanting to have every book read in a timely fashion so that we can let an author/publisher know whether or not we&#039;re going to publish a review.

We have had some truly wonderful, well-received books that are from smaller, nontraditional presses. As you say, though, the publisher who sets up shop to print/promote just its own work is more often &quot;miss&quot; than &quot;hit.&quot; There is so much more to the process than writing and illustration. All audiences want quality work, but for our audience - kids who are already struggling with reading - lots of typos, poor sentence structure, redundant/run-on text, and weak grammar - can be devastating. We can&#039;t use those books at all. The make or break point often pivots on editing. Independent editors - not spouses, friends, or Aunt Pearl - are so critical to moving from hobby to industry professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Susan &#8211; We read every book we receive and they are all cataloged so that when I find someone who has an interest in the topic, I can place the book with that audience. We think it is better for the reader and (potentially) the creator. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, it is a bit time consuming. Since last fall we&#8217;ve closed the mailbox to new authors/publishers. We continue to get books from existing donors and we&#8217;ve gotten about 400 so far this year. That is still a LOT of material to read. </p>
<p>Our model is not first-in-first-out, but I am very conscious of wanting to have every book read in a timely fashion so that we can let an author/publisher know whether or not we&#8217;re going to publish a review.</p>
<p>We have had some truly wonderful, well-received books that are from smaller, nontraditional presses. As you say, though, the publisher who sets up shop to print/promote just its own work is more often &#8220;miss&#8221; than &#8220;hit.&#8221; There is so much more to the process than writing and illustration. All audiences want quality work, but for our audience &#8211; kids who are already struggling with reading &#8211; lots of typos, poor sentence structure, redundant/run-on text, and weak grammar &#8211; can be devastating. We can&#8217;t use those books at all. The make or break point often pivots on editing. Independent editors &#8211; not spouses, friends, or Aunt Pearl &#8211; are so critical to moving from hobby to industry professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Chook</title>
		<link>http://childrens-literacy.com/2009/08/15/reading-ahead-august/comment-page-1/#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Chook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://childrens-literacy.com/?p=1487#comment-689</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s wonderful that you get so many donated books! I am guessing you must turn some away because of the time it takes to &quot;process&quot; each book, despite your panel of reviewers.

Ecky Thump publishers intrigued me because I remember &quot;ecky thump&quot; from TV show The Goodies. It seems to be a publisher with one book. This seems to be happening more and more, because technology is making it easier to set up a company to publish a book.So far, my experience with books that fall outside the traditional publishers has not been great, so I look forward to your feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s wonderful that you get so many donated books! I am guessing you must turn some away because of the time it takes to &#8220;process&#8221; each book, despite your panel of reviewers.</p>
<p>Ecky Thump publishers intrigued me because I remember &#8220;ecky thump&#8221; from TV show The Goodies. It seems to be a publisher with one book. This seems to be happening more and more, because technology is making it easier to set up a company to publish a book.So far, my experience with books that fall outside the traditional publishers has not been great, so I look forward to your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
